<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Homologous Legs Mini &#187; Tetrapods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mini.naontiotami.com/tag/tetrapods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mini.naontiotami.com</link>
	<description>Micro-evolutionary bursts of change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Excellent comment on the &#8220;Tetrapod Tracks&#8221; issue from The Panda&#8217;s Thumb</title>
		<link>http://mini.naontiotami.com/2010/01/excellent-comment-on-the-tetrapod-tracks-issue-from-the-pandas-thumb/</link>
		<comments>http://mini.naontiotami.com/2010/01/excellent-comment-on-the-tetrapod-tracks-issue-from-the-pandas-thumb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naontiotami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casey Luskin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panda's Thumb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetrapods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mini.naontiotami.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this comment on &#8220;Casey Luskin embarrasses himself again&#8221; on The Panda&#8217;s Thumb blog perfectly summarises the entire tetrapod-tracks-20-million-years-before-Tiktaalik-disproves-evolution argument that the Discovery Institute has recently been pushing around: Leszek wrote: So basically the “great minds” of creationism have come up with the argument: If tetrapods evolved from Tiktaalik, why are there still tiktaaliks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="page-title">I think <a href="http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2010/01/casey-luskin-em.html#comment-203652">this comment on &#8220;Casey Luskin embarrasses himself again&#8221;</a> on <em>The Panda&#8217;s Thumb</em> blog perfectly summarises the entire tetrapod-tracks-20-million-years-before-<em>Tiktaalik</em>-disproves-evolution argument that the Discovery Institute has <a href="http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/01/tiktaalik_blown_out_of_the_wat.html">recently been pushing around</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Leszek wrote:<br />
</strong></p></blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote><p>So basically the “great minds” of creationism have come up with the argument:</p>
<p>If tetrapods evolved from Tiktaalik, why are there still tiktaaliks around [10 million years later]?</p>
<p>It seems to me I have heard this before somewhere.…</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh Leszek, how very, very true that is. *chortle*</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mini.naontiotami.com/2010/01/excellent-comment-on-the-tetrapod-tracks-issue-from-the-pandas-thumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
